As we come on the air tonight, much of America shutting down.
We will shut you down.
We will arrest you and we will take you to jail.
He’s chocking me!
The welfare of humanity
has always been the alibi of tyrants.
I think regional quarantine facilities are going to be needed into the future.
We will also need it for unvaccinated people.
So this, I’m going to give you a warning, yeah?
Warning, warning...
due to the national state of emergency because of COVID 19.
We must ask everybody to stay inside, thank you for your collaboration.
Is this the future you want for us?
To all the critical thinkers,
join us.
Join us.
It isn't about breaking the fourth wave.
It is all about breaking people.
We do not comply.
We are in a strange place,
you know, in a strange place, in the corona
lockdown, you know
that that would be the opening, to that would be the opening.
I have never seen the Great Lawn so empty.
This is not life.
The government is destroying people's lives,
just creating fear,
making people behave irrationally.
I was very puzzled since the very beginning, and I mean,
I was alert to the fact that
what we were living was not quite right.
It was like
a programed and orchestrated action,
which was almost in the same way all over the world.
There must be a plan behind this when it turns out
that the pandemic isn't a pandemic, but it's just something like the common flu.
And when it turns out
these people were telling us about these PCR tests are lying to us.
So the next question, of course, is who's doing this for what purpose?
This is a very, very
serious matter, has nothing to do with hygiene.
It has to do with criminology.
You're regularly
pledging obedience to things which are not logical.
Are we somehow fueling
the very system that is harming us?
If you have fear, root it out,
if you've decided someone or something is so important
that you give up your liberty, reexamine that decision
and claim your liberty over whatever that thing is .
I would say the most striking thing about this whole experience has been
just feeling alone,
you know, and kind of being told that we don't matter or that we're crazy
and that we're being sacrificed for a greater good.
And that's, that's been really the hardest thing for me.
Communist system, the communist system,
really wanted to separate us.
It was not social distancing, but practically
it was the same idea and the same logic to not to let us go together, to talk
and potentially to prepare a revolution to destroy communism.
I want people to feel free again.
Not suppressed.
Incarcerated.
When I first
heard the phrase lockdown, for example, I hope, like most people, I thought,
this is a phrase you use in relation to controlling unruly prisoners.
They have lockdowns in prison when there's some particular trouble and they want
all the inmates confined to their cells so they can deal with the problem.
And we're not inmates in society.
We're not subjects of a king.
We're supposed to be citizens in a participatory democracy.
It's a control measure.
And I think pretty much all that has happened since is to do with control.
So when you hear lockdown,
that ought to set off alarm bells somewhere
in the recesses of your mind, because that's not the kind of phrase
that politicians ought to be using in any sort of free society.
It was clear to me from the beginning that this is unconstitutional.
This is completely illegal.
Ventilators, ventilators, ventilators.
What am I going to do with 400 ventilators when I need 30,000?
I didn't know what they were a few weeks ago.
Flatten the curve, flatten the curve, flatten the curve.
The COVID 19 narrative started in the mid spring with this idea
that we were going to flatten the curve or we're going to slow the spread.
In fact, the White House campaign was 15 days to slow the spread,
and the reason of being in need to flatten
the curve was because we needed to spread the hospitalization of people.
Well, what actually happened is the health care system absorbed the shock.
We had thousands of beds at the Javits Center that continued to be open
and navy ship that sat next to Manhattan that had no use.
And so the story almost immediately changed.
The narrative transitioned seamlessly into effectively a kind of rolling barrage
of lockdowns and shutdowns and quarantines and mask wearing,
presumably in order to prevent the spread of the virus itself.
When W.H.O.
asked to eliminate the virus, claiming that we are able to bring it down,
lock it down, close it down.
Is that possible? To eliminate it? Definitely not.
Whatever the argument was at the beginning,
we now actually have the evidence
and we know we can actually look at the states
that locked down in the states that didn't.
We can compare countries that locked down with countries that did not.
The countries that did a lockdown proper lockdown had the peak,
the alpine peak, the peak of the Alps.
If I could say when Sweden
got a much more flattened curve,
although they didn't do any lockdown.
We'd like to believe that lockdowns
may have been costly, but at least they were beneficial.
The reality is that lockdowns were virtually all pain and no gain.
So what we do is we quarantine the sick.
We've always done that.
Now we've quarantined the sick because that's
how you avoid infecting, you know, the wider population.
So the idea of quarantining the well, the so-called lockdown is a new invention,
and it has no foundations whatsoever, either in science
or in the history of controlling epidemics.
We should work towards herd immunity to end the lockdowns and reopen businesses.
Basically, young, healthy people should get naturally infected.
The vulnerable should be protected and we can thus reach herd immunity.
Most public health experts say that is a dangerous path.
I think that that's extremely unrealistic.
Herd immunity is not so much a policy is just it's just a fact of nature.
There is no superhero who is immune from this disease.
The fact of questioning whether we would have
an immune response to it was very, very strange.
We need to learn some tough lessons from this.
I'm talking about honoring
the decades of work and
science that have gone to contribute
to our present understanding of virology,
transmission, epidemiologic factors.
We've had.
It said that
if you're going to go from point A to point B, you've got to wear a mask.
But once you point B, you can take the mask off.
Doesn't matter.
We have absolutely sacrificed science.
And thrown it at the feet of panic and frenzy.
Do any of the restrictions on public life make any sense?
No, none at all.
In fact, that's why they should be lifted immediately.
All of them.
Border closures, school closures, social distancing.
There's almost no science behind most of these.
We really can't take a crisis like this and turn it over
to politicians, bureaucrats, academicians and intellectuals.
COVID-19 is approximately
equivalent in lethality to seasonal flu.
The infection fatality rate for this new coronavirus
is likely to be in the same ballpark as seasonal influenza.
I think it will be like a severe influenza season, the same as
which would be .1%, maybe.
Given this virus represents at worst,
a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill as influenza and a less risk
a smaller risk to almost everyone else who's younger and fit.
It was never necessary for us to have done anything.
We didn't need to do anything.
Lockdowns, masks, mass testing,
vaccines even.
I was sitting at my desk
and I was swamped that day.
Sick patients trying to keep up with
what was going on in the Senate, and I was flipping through emails
and I scroll down and click on an email from the Department of Health.
And when I got to the bottom of it,
where it
seemed like it was coaching me to use
COVID-19 as a diagnosis
in situations that I wouldn't have used influenza or any other specific
viral diagnosis without having tested for it.
And frankly, my thought was, damn it.
That's not the way we should be doing things.
And what struck me right away was that I felt like I was being coached
to go ahead and use COVID-19 without using the same standards
of precision that I would, for other things.
If I'm going to make a diagnosis
I believe as a physician, I have an obligation to use the tools
available to me to nail it down with as much certainty as possible.
And it seemed to me that the Department of Health
and the link to the CDC document that said that you could diagnose
COVID-19 as a cause of death on a death certificate.
It seemed to me that those two documents in tandem
went against all that I had
been taught or doing for the last 35 years.
There were enormous changes made in attribution of causes of death.
So we've never had anything as absurd as the rule that is now used.
So if you should die within 28 days of having a positive result in a,
you know, an inappropriate test using molecular biology,
then you would be declared to have died of COVID-19.
That’s just wrong.
You know, it's not just a matter
of disagreeing professionally, it's just complete nonsense.
Technically, if even if you died of a clear alternate
cause but you had COVID at the same time, it's still listed as a COVID death.
So everyone who's listed as a COVID death doesn't mean that
that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of death.
I hope that's helpful.
What CDC has said, is anybody that tests positive.
If they then die, that's a death among cases.
How many have died from COVID-19
that do not have any other underlying health condition?
Nationally, the numbers are vanishingly
small and in less than 10%.
I think I saw something like 6%.
You just divide those numbers that that are presented to you
by the press, by a factor of ten and then you are down to earth.
And when you do this in Germany, for instance, you come to a number
that starts to be absolutely ridiculous.
You have to realize that in Germany, 2500 people are dying every day.
Of these, ten
have been dying because of COVID-19.
But of these
2500, 1000 are dying because of heart attack.
Another 800 dying because of cancer.
Another, you know, it's and at least 50 are dying
because of pneumococcal pneumonia five times more than COVID.
There is no more deaths in 2020 than other years.
And they're not stopping the pandemic.
They're not stopping this mess.
So there is a problem of governance because it is clearly one person
directing with an NGO that has become a business international organization
with full immunity given by the Swiss government.
So who's directing the Swiss government is the big question.
Like, who is directing really the United Nations?
A record
average of more than 80,000 cases a day now in this country, 47 states,
and the number of new cases is rising faster than ever, and why?
None of us have ever been told to slow down on testing.
In fact, we will be doing more testing.
We have a simple message for all countries
test,
test.
In January 2020,
another thing started and that was that
there was a test, a PCR test
that was invented by Mr. Drosten, and it was accepted by W.H.O.
and the W.H.O. said yes.
When the test is positive, we have a "case" of COVID-19.
So the meaning of the word "case" has been changed
during the data collection of an epidemic
that is from an epidemiologist and for everybody else,
the worst thing that can happen.
I realized very quickly that it was used to define "cases".
Cases
for us in our language
is about patients, and here
the cases became the positivity to PCR,
so forget about the individual.
It was just a result from a technique.
They're now calling apples oranges.
And now there are many oranges, many more than they were before.
Before they called apples, oranges.
Even the W.H.O. agrees that it's not enough
for a PCR test for you to test positive on a PCR test,
but you need symptoms, and it's never in the history of mankind
in the history of medicine, there has never been testing of healthy people.
You should not be using this test on people without symptoms.
Mass testing of people without symptoms has no underpinning science at all,
and it's just a way of frightening people.
It creates the impression
that something bad is happening because there are so many cases.
No, they are not so many cases.
We have finally built this crisis
with this new definition of cases
based on these PCR testing,
and this is how they started counting the cases.
What they counted was the activity of testing,
and the more they tested, the more cases they found.
$100 billion to roll out a nationwide test.
For starters, we're at about 1 million tests per week.
where there will be millions of tests per several weeks.
What we experience at the moment is nothing more
than a PCR test Pandemic.
There's no connection between what happened, the accident
from Wuhan laboratory
and the spreading of the test are two different things
that not need to be connected because the test is positive
with viruses long that existed long ago, that existed before.
They are positive with all beta coronaviruses
with lots of SARS viruses that exist
around 20 years , all over the world.
We have created a situation where so many people are so fearful
that reality doesn't enter their mind anymore.
The PCR
method
developed by Mullis, who got the Nobel Prize for this,
he himself said, “Do not use this test for diagnosis.”
He said, and made it very clear this is not a technology
to be used for diagnosing viral disease.
This is a technology that can help us
take a small strand of DNA material,
and if you will manufacture
billions times more so we can work with it and learn.
The PCR, If you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.
It starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion
that everything is contained in everything else, right?
I mean, because if you can amplify one single molecule up to
something you can really measure which PCR can do.
Then there's just very few molecules
that you don't have at least one single one of them in your body, OK?
So that could be thought of as a misuse of it, just to claim that it's meaningful.
This test
should be trashed immediately worldwide,
and it should be considered a criminal act
for anyone to be sent to quarantine
because this test was positive.
Since early February,
we have said that asymptomatic people can transmit COVID-19.
We are constantly looking at this data.
It still appears to be rare
that an asymptomatic individual actually transmits onward.
We know that most of the spread are from asymptomatic people, particularly young adults.
Children under the age of ten can be asymptomatic carriers of the virus.
It's very difficult, it's very hard to fight an invisible enemy.
We could be sick.
We could be infected and asymptomatic, not showing any symptoms.
In all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type,
asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks.
The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person.
An epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers.
This idea, for example, that you can be ill
even though you have no symptoms and you can be a respiratory
virus threat to someone else, even though you have no symptoms.
That's also invented in 2020.
It is complete nonsense.
It's never been shown.
It's a claim that has been spread as a fact, and this I consider criminal.
And this asymptomatic
is a terrifying
definition because it makes you
the others anyone that I meet as the enemy.
You have become a potential enemy to me because you're
potentially bringing with you the SARS-CoV-2.
And this is actually terrible because it denies
the capacity of a person to be a healthy person
because if asymptomatic exists, then who is healthy?
No one.
Anyone who is surrounding us, our relatives, our friends
and who shows no symptoms
who's perfectly healthy or appears perfectly healthy could be a threat.
That's what this induces.
That's what this fraud, that there are asymptomatic infections induces.
It tells us, Oh my god, everybody could be potentially dangerous.
That is not true.
It was not clear whether an asymptomatic person
could transmit it to someone while they were asymptomatic.
Now we know from a recent report from Germany that that is absolutely the case.
The asymptomatic infection is based on a on a scientific paper
which was published by Drosten, and this Chinese woman,
which is quoted in that paper, was not asymptomatic at all.
She was sick. She had the normal flu.
So this claim
that this Chinese woman was asymptomatic is a fraud.
It's not true.
In order to transmit a virus to be a good, efficient source of infection,
you have to have a lot of virus, and if you have a lot of virus,
virus is attacking you and you are fighting back.
That process produces symptoms.
Inevitably, it's not not just occasionally must always happen.
That's what they obviously want to get through that
asymtomatic healthy people are a threat to the community
so that everybody has to be tested and then vaccinated
after you are vaccinated and then they say you
are free again, until the next
mutation comes and then we have to do the next vaccine so it's an endless game.
You can do it every year again.
We know from a big study in China now, we are very sure
that there is no such thing as asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19.
We don't have it.
You don't have to be afraid.
The World Health Organization quietly
changed the definition of the term herd immunity this year.
The newer definition focuses on vaccines only and removes the line
about building herd immunity through previous infections.
Herd immunity is
a concept used for vaccination
in which a population can be protected
from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.
W.H.O. is in Geneva, the headquarters and it’s the World Health Organization,
and it is responsible to coordinate for member states and also to take care,
for example, of the international classification of diseases.
If I have to say something about the crisis is, I think it's a crisis
of the language and especially in science and in medical sciences.
There where
a number of words that we could not connect properly.
A big problem with W.H.O.
is they're changing definitions without scientific validation
at the international level.
They are changing the definition of epidemic of pandemic.
We have therefore made the assessment
that COVID-19 can be characterized as a pandemic.
Pandemic
is not
a word to use lightly or carelessly.
It's a word that, if misused,
can cause unreasonable fear.
Each one, everyone in the street would notice
that there is a pandemic because the neighbors would get ill.
The people at work would get ill in the bus you would see it,
the people coughing, you would really, a pandemic, you cannot oversee it.
It's something each of us can and would experience.
This was a pandemic and the W.H.O. changed it.
Why the W.H.O.?
Then we heard that the definition of a pandemic has been changed.
But I've heard no reason why.
All the business deals that had been prepared between individual countries and
the pharmaceutical companies...
The scientific criteria for an influenza pandemic have been met.
There was a new definition that had been coined
by the World Health Organization in 2009.
It suppressed the notion of severity.
The pharmaceutical industry pressed W.H.O.
to change the pandemic,
the definition of pandemic,
and they just wiped out
that there should be many severe cases and many deaths.
You can change a definition and you can change the world,
and we had this change of a definition.
And with this change of a definition,
it was the tool how the fear was driven worldwide.
In the spring of 2009, public health officials
were alerted to an unusual outbreak of influenza.
The world was confronted
with a new flu virus, to which it appeared no one had immunity.
The potential existed for a severe pandemic.
They changed the pandemic, the definition of pandemic again
just some month ago, when they said,
we have something like a permanent pandemic, we have an inter-pandemic period
and then we have a post-pandemic period and then we have the pandemic period.
And they they said we they made us think and understand
pandemic as a permanent thing with waves coming again and again.
And this is the picture now W.H.O. uses.
And this is also what Bill Gates uses, what the pharmaceutical industry uses,
they frighten us with the next wave to come and with new mutations.
So it's a very good business model.
They are not complying to the obligation
that they have to coordinate information, but not to decide for member states.
And today, you see clearly they are deciding unilaterally.
Now we have a political problem.
They are responsible for having announced and having
obliged
as leaders,
given a recommendation to get the vaccination that is experimental.
So where is the consequence?
So this goes higher.
By the time we got to about
the third main theme of this pandemic and how to control it,
I knew I was being lied to all the time by government
scientists, their advisers, by ministers, people on the TV.
And I'm afraid that impression has simply firmed up as time has gone on.
Suddenly, I saw too many lies and too many different rhetorics, uncertainties.
I wrote an article in Acta Biomedica on WTO International Health
Regulation uncertainties and
in that I was already questioning.
So I questioned and
I saw very well that there was something wrong.
A number of scientists and doctors who have been saying
We have trouble, the Declaration of Great Barrington,
we have trouble, Doctors for Ethics, we have trouble, 57 scientists
in which I am,
putting forth a paper
asking to stop the vaccination, but it seems as though nobody listen.
And it's it's sad because we need this discussion.
We need to be face to face and to have this discussion and to force
the laboratories to provide the answer
to it, to all of this.
So as time went on, I found
when I talked to fellow scientists, often retired scientists or academics, people
I grew up with who are now now hold chairs in immunology.
They would agree with me privately that the PCR testing,
as it was being done, was complete nonsense and fraudulent, so that
the attribution of deaths in the way we've done it is completely stupid.
Lockdown clearly was irrational and probably killing lots of people.
But the difference was they were not willing
to say anything in public because they said it's been
intimated that the authorities in the university
didn't want us to challenge the government narrative or that of its advisers.
So we're not.
And that's what happened.
We ended up with people looking the other way.
Some of them, they get a lot of money that they say the opposite.
And some of them are just afraid to lose their job.
People told me 'you shouldn't discuss, this is a bad situation.'
Everybody must be at the order saying, OK, this is like that.
And this is to me very similar to the Soviet times where I lived.
There was only one meaning admitted,
and when you had another meaning you were declared as an enemy.
Or as a spy?
Or as a conspiracy theorist?
The Soviet powers did this.
When you had another opinion, they said, 'you are a conspiracy group,
you have a conspiracy theory.’
‘You have hate speech.’
This expression, hate speech came from the communists.
People should oppose all kinds of government restrictions.
And this is the only
lesson
which we have learned from from the history
and especially which we have learned from our communist era.
It's when we delegate authority to some central
government
whose dealings now are totally intertwined with very big business
and pharmaceutical industry is just about one of the
least ethical of all.
And they are being given
access, total free access to our bodies, our minds.
What could be stupider than that?
I mean, it truly as stupid.
Not just not everyone is evil,
but a lot of stupid people bring the evil ones
into positions that they should never be
in.
It’s government by decree.
It's government by confusing and contradicting.
Rules and regulations, so that's what they're trying to do
and why are they doing this?
This is a psychological operation because the only way
you can get people to do stuff that they otherwise wouldn't do
is by keeping them in a constant mode of panic.
Fear makes us act totally irrationally.
And that's what we see.
Nothing makes sense.
This creates
a situation whereby people give up on using their own minds.
They delegate their minds to the herd, to the authority.
I don't know what to think anymore.
It's so absurd, all these contradictory information.
Human beings crave coherence.
And so if youcan put them in a state of incoherence,
they will literally do anything they can to get back to coherence.
It's a typical torture tactic.
If you just do what I want I will allow you to go back to a state of coherence.
If you just accept the passports, you'll be free.
Or if you get the vaccination, you'll just be free.
I never thought I'd be in a situation
where I could imagine what it might have been like
to be in Guyana
with Jimmy Jones in 1978.
What must it have been like for those people to incrementally move
towards a place
where finally they were willing to drink
cyanide laced Kool-Aid?
Hour in hour out,
day in, day out, week in, week out, month in, month out.
One story after another, one piece of bad news after another,
one more sensationalized headline.
It's almost like
we're slowly being beaten down
until we get to a point
where we say Uncle, I give up.
I'll drink the Kool-Aid.
Nowadays, the people,
when they have a question, they don't try to find an answer
and they don't try to collectively find an answer
with their friends or their family and something rooted in reality.
They go into a controlled thing Wikipedia.
And they will have a direct answer given
by kind of a superior consciousness that could be the digital world.
But it's it's grounded in a lie.
Schools, the quality of schools is very,
very low and is growing lower
and lower because keeping people ignorant
is the key to success in that case.
I think we should de-invest.
We should go away from this illusion, from this delusion and go back to the real.
And that's my advice.
I'm a doctor. I can prescribe you something.
I prescribe you to turn off the TV,
turn off your smartphone,
get back to the reality.
Alpha Beta Gamma Delta.
These are the variants of the coronavirus, and there is a new one
called the Delta Plus.
It sounds startling...
The variant of concern...
A new double mutant...
We are worried about the Delta variant...
Double mutant strain...
Should we fear the Delta variant?
Absolutely.
Growing concerns about Omnicron
the new coronavirus strain.
The fifth variant of concern.
You don't want to frighten the American public,
but when something occurs that you need to take seriously...
What we are seeing clinically in South Africa is extremely mild for us
that's mild cases.
We haven't admitted anyone.
I spoke to other colleagues of mine, same picture.
We have 48 cases in California we've identified.
In the vast majority, the overwhelming majority have been fully vaccinated.
See these people got infected with Omicron.
All of them showed mild or no symptoms.
I would just want to urge everyone.
Vaccines work. Vaccines are effective.
It's going to take longer to beat COVID-19 and older mutations we're seeing
if we don't vaccinate the rest of the world fast.
You've being infected,
you'll mostly survive unless you're very close to death anyway.
You're then immune, probably for decades, possibly for life.
It's not true that the variants represent any kind of threat.
It's not true that you need a top up vaccine.
Most of you don't need a vaccine at all.
It's quite normal for RNA viruses like SARS-CoV-2
when it replicates to make typographical errors.
That's what it does, typos.
And those are called variants.
But it's really important that you know
that if you find the variant
that's most different from the sequence identified in Wuhan,
that that variant that is most
distant is only .3% different from the original sequence.
There were some experiments done last year
where they found people who had been infected by SARS 17 years earlier
and asked them to donate blood, and they did.
A 20% difference was not enough
to trick these people's immune system that it was a new virus.
It easily recognized it as a sibling, a brother,
a cousin of something they’ve conquered already.
It's simply not true that the variants that it throws off as it replicates
are sufficiently different from each other to represent any threat at all.
It's not even unlikely, it's impossible.
When you're government scientists tell you that a variant that's 0.3%
different from SARS could masquerade as a new virus
and be a threat to your health, you should know, and I'm telling you, they
are lying.
If they're lying and they are,
why is the pharmaceutical industry making top up
vaccines?
What a lockdown does
is make all of us less healthy because it interferes with producing goods
and services that serve the needs and wants of human beings?
When we're talking about tradeoffs,
this idea that, well right now is not the time to think
about the economy right now is the time for all of us to stay home and be healthy.
That's absolutely a falsehood and a false distinction,
because these two things are one and the same.
When you want to talk about the growth and the vitality
of the American economy, it all begins with small businesses.
Those small businesses
they’re all over Europe, more or less killed.
That's the real issue of the day and how to
return,
how to go back to the old situation?
It would take years, decades, not just months or weeks.
I think that the people are now weaker
than they used to be eight months ago.
Suicides are skyrocketing.
Businesses are dying.
The entire middle class is very, very close to bankruptcy, not just in Germany.
That impoverishment is going to cause far more deaths from hunger,
from suicide, from alcoholism, from desolation.
That's what we ought to be worrying about, not the danger posed by the COVID virus,
which is absolutely manageable.
This has been our premise all along,
was that this is not equal protection under the law,
this is very unfair and damaging to small businesses.
Meanwhile, you've had big business allowed to continue business
as usual, while Middle America and the hard working
middle class of this country is just being decimated.
Many restaurants and bars across Melbourne are still struggling
for customers despite lockdown five ending.
Under the new rules, non-essential shops will be shuttered.
Stores such as Lowe's and Home Depot remain open, per the governor's order.
Whether by intention or not,
what we saw is a kind of massive transfer of wealth
in the economy away from all of these tens of thousands of small and often
family owned businesses toward very large,
publicly owned businesses that happen to benefit from the digital economy.
I would think whether you're left, right, center, libertarian, whatever.
That's something that ought to trouble you.
We have 100 small businesses on Main Street in a community.
You declare them non-essential, shut them down,
suddenly, Amazon and Walmart and the big-box stores can come in
and take away all the market share.
In the meantime, the people on Main Street have to keep paying off their credit
cards or their mortgage, so they're in a debt entrapment,
and they're desperate to get cash flow
to cover basically their debts and their day to day expenses.
In the meantime, you have the Federal Reserve institute
a form of quantitative easing where they're buying corporate bonds
and the and the guys who are taking up the market share can basically finance
at 1%, or their banks can, at zero to 1% when everybody in Main Street
is paying 16 to 17% of their credit cards without income.
So basically now you've got them over a barrel
and you can take away their market share.
And generally they can't afford to do anything
because they're too busy trying to find money to feed their kids.
Open churches, open churches.
It's about the freedom. I cannot work because of the governor's edict.
...one of Santiago's poorest neighborhoods,
and now many of its residents
are going hungry.
These protests are everywhere and in Germany nearly
every weekend we have 10 to 20 protest marches.
Deception for the people.
Deception for the people, this is theater,
world theater.
Somehow this COVID-19 is
leeching away the best we have to offer ourselves and one another.
That's why I get so angry inside
to even think
that there could be some sort of agenda,
that is being satisfied
through,
collectively our global response
to this pandemic.
When I was having my sentinel/survey of flu
in my, in my region
public health region, there were about 120,
150,000 people living and working there.
And so I had 10% of them in the very heavy flu season,
and that means 10,000 patients with flu.
And in Mexico, there were 600.
What's that?
There are 20 million people living in this region,
and they spoke about pandemic.
I did not understand that.
This is the reason why I started
making my research
trying to find out what was going on.
And I found out this was a big, big hoax.
The business deals prepared that had been prepared between
individual countries and the pharmaceutical companies
were about to be triggered by the WHO.
The contracts were mostly confidential.
And then I found out
about the contracts of vaccines that were
prepared already.
Many countries, including Germany, Italy, France and Great Britain,
concluded secret agreements with pharmaceutical companies
before the swine flu incident, which obliged them to purchase
swine flu vaccinations, but only if the W.H.O.
issued a pandemic Level 6 Alert.
I found out about the plans of the W.H.O.
about "Pandemic Preparedness," which already started
when W.H.O. invited the industry to do something for health
and the investors came like Bill Gates with Bill Melinda Gates Foundation,
Wellcome Trust, and they all came and they gave money to W.H.O.
and they made a public private partnership out of W.H.O..
Today, U.N. organizations, foundations, NGOs
and industry contribute almost 40% of the W.H.O.'s annual budget.
Our priorities are your priorities.
There are people who are interested in you,
infectious diseases spreading.
And this is a very,
very serious matter.
It has nothing to do with hygiene,
it has to do with criminology.
If we have to literally search for
dark shadows, boogeyman
and bad people around every corner,
I don't know how we get motivated in the morning
to get up and try to make the world a better place and leave the legacy
of having improved the world, at least a little bit.
Medicine
is a big business.
Probably the the biggest business in the whole planet.
Big business means, unfortunately Big Corruption.
So with all the amount of money you can corrupt
you can corrupt politicians,
you can corrupt medical doctors,
you can corrupt souls if you want.
The idea of public health where you're looking at how do you do
the best job can for the most people, that's totally lost
and you can see it here with the policies around COVID-19.
They're designed to kill people, really.
I mean, that's a strong accusation to make,
but but nobody's ever been able to explain to me how how public health
or anybody's health improves by taking an 80 year old person
and depriving them of human contact until they give up their will to live.
That's the type of behavior you would expect from Nazis,
not from public health officials.
These countries have used COVID as the opportunity
to initiate
euthanasia for the elderly and disabled,
to get rid of the economic burden,
to get rid of those who still remember history.
For twelve months now, we have seen, a real,
from my point of view,
a kind of genocide or on elder people.
And this is really a big, big problem
and somebody has to take account of this issue.
It has disillusioned
us, my wife and myself,
and we are frightened that,
the public, the people around us, don't
realize that they are being led to their downfall,
led to their doom as human beings
because they are losing their rights.
Surveillance will need to continue.
Contacts will still need to be traced and quarantined.
A vaccine on its own will not end the pandemic.
So for the world at large, normalcy only returns
when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population.
Seven sports stadiums
are already being used as mega vaccination sites across the country.
I am completely sure that it was not appropriate to go
only for a massive vaccination.
There had never been any vaccination approved for a coronavirus.
To say it now is to say now we are going to develop it and implement
it as a massive solution it is awkward.
It doesn't sound right to me.
This is a truly experimental vaccine on the entire world.
So these gene based vaccines are not approved
by any medical authority like the FDA,
European Medical Agency
Medicines Agency.
They are available only under what's called an "Emergency Use Authorization”.
So if there wasn't an emergency,
they simply couldn't be administered at all.
We don't know very much about them.
We don't know anything at all about the potential for long term side effects.
There's three things you'd like from a vaccine.
You'd like it to be very safe in all the populations
that you've indicated it for with no side effects,
you'd like it
to block transmission and you'd like it to prevent
the individual who gets the vaccine from getting sick.
When we're looking
at the research endpoints right now with Moderna and Pfizer,
the benefits they're telling us, what are they looking for, the results?
What is a success to them?
Well, there's only two endpoints they look for.
One is does it prevent you from having a positive PCR test?
Number two, does it prevent you from having one COVID-19 symptom?
Just one?
That's it.
The phase three endpoint is slightly different than those things...
These are the most important endpoints to look at.
The research on both Moderna and Pfizer are skipping that.
They're not looking at that.
We don't know if these vaccines will work.
We don't know if they'll work to avoid deaths.
We don't know if they'll work to avoid transmission.
Once you get the second dose that you might just get
two months of immunity, just two months, that's it.
So there's very little efficacy or benefit by taking these vaccines.
But then when you look at the risks, you see a lot of things
we need to be concerned about.
Is there something to worry about with medicines?
Might some of them have side effects?
Do we need safety testing? I mean, we're taking
things that are genetically modified organisms
and we are injecting them into little kids arms.
We just shoot them right into the vein.
So, yeah, I think maybe we should have a safety system
where we do trials and test things out.
The mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy.
I always like to say, if we had surveyed two years ago,
the public, would you be willing to take a gene
gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?
We would have probably had a 95% refusal rate.
I think this pandemic has also opened many people's eyes to innovation
in the way that was maybe not possible before.
By coincidence, all of the pharma companies have focused on the spike protein
which is again triggering because the spike protein
is the hotspot of the genome in terms of mutation.
So if you want some specificity,
you are not going to go on the path that varies the most
you're going to go and the part that is more steady,
they took the strategy of, focusing,
targeting the spike protein,
which is a good solution if you want to say that you are going
to develop several vaccines because each time you have some variation,
some mutation in the spike, you may need to develop new vaccines.
Shares of Moderna are getting a boost today.
Pfizer actually hitting a new high after the FDA authorized COVID-19 booster shots.
If you think about it,
there's still a lot of viruses for which we do not have vaccines yet.
And if you think about it from an economic standpoint
vaccines have the best returns on health care dollars.
And so we need to look at as a globe, and we're involved
with many European leaders and African leaders and others
in Southeast Asia to make sure there's a purchasing fund
that can pull that vaccine through when it's available and get it out.
The reality is that you're
injecting mRNA within
the capsule
which is a greasy capsule.
So in this case,
you use liposome
as a Trojan horse.
Liposome, as a,
composition similar
to that of the cell membrane,
so that it is a trick
that is used in order to to have a foreign
RNA enter into the cell.
So now the mRNA will be recognized by
your system, so you have the nucleus with your DNA
and you have all these little ribosomes
that will be ready to read to scan through
and read this element to be producing the spike protein.
And because of that, you will get some antibody
to be
synthesized to fight spike.
Before you get the
immunity, building antibodies,
you get this spike to,
I guess, bind to the receptors.
And this comes to one of my concern.
I have a number of concerns.
One is about the fact that the spike
may eventually bind to receptors.
And where do we have the most of ACE 2 receptors
and the BSG receptors and the nuropean 1 receptors?
Those are the three types of receptors to spike.
Testies is the hotspot.
Sir, your testies.
The second would be the placenta,
Basically. And third would be the intestine.
Can the COVID-19 vaccine cause infertility?
This is probably the most common question I get from women...
A so-called sterilizing vaccine, because it gives you that full protection...
These vaccines are unlikely to completely sterilize the population.
They're very likely to have an effect, which works in a percentage,
say, 60 or 70%.
[Interrupts] Professor John Bell.
There is no long-term data looking at these vaccines.
We don't know what can happen a year after this vaccine, right?
We just developed it.
I share some caution on this because
we don’t know the long-term side effects of
basically modifying people's DNA and RNA.
We've been funding mRNA for over ten years,
and now it's accelerated its development.
If we can make Messenger RNA work safely in humans,
it will be a very broad platform, a new class of medicines.
I think there is going to be a lot of breakthroughs on
the medical front, particularly around synthetic mRNA.
It's like a computer program.
You can basically do any, you can turn somone into a freeking
butterfly if you want with the right DNA sequence.
mRNA is an information molecule, it's like software.
It's the software of life.
There are four letters that makes every one of our drugs.
It's just the order of the letters that goes from product one to product two.
So once you figure out how to make it work once,
then you can have a lot of new products coming very quickly.
No matter what this is the classic alphabet for RNA.
Here, this synthetic piece
is not relying on this alphabet, but on that alphabet,
A-Y-G-C.
No U,
every single U was replaced by a Y,
meaning that your cells receive now something that they've never heard of.
They've never seen.
We are in the experimentation.
We have loads of questions but no answers.
These
new injections that we call vaccines
give a lot of problems, a lot of very important adverse effects,
microcoagulation occur nearly everywhere
and these are very difficult and dangerous things.
Then, of course, because of this microcoagulation,
you can have any kind of
stroke,
myocarditis, a problem of thrombosis
or pulmonary embolism, so on and so on.
Autoimmune disease
can be triggered
by these gene based vaccines.
Maybe it has come to the stage that you already have the antibodies
but this cell is late in producing the spike protein.
And because you have the antibody, what do you think the antibody does?
It goes to
destroy your cell,
your own cell.
Is that healthy?
This is called an auto immune response,
and it is and a hypothesis as to understanding
what happens in thrombosis and all these vascular
issues that we have seen.
We have some examples of patients, I could see their blood with this
dark field microscopy just before and just after and it really does change.
Really, you can see that it's getting worse afterward.
In the beginning of this year,
I said, yes, it's very easy to treat the persons who have the
the COVID disease, but we don't know how to treat the vaccinated.
Hey, my name's Kyle Warner.
I'm a professional mountain bike racer.
And I took the Pfizer vaccine.
My second doses on June 10th, and about a month later I developed
pericarditis, which is swelling of the lining of the heart
as well as POTS and reactive arthritis.
It's brought an end to my career as I know it,
and a lot of my just day to day life has changed drastically.
Most of our vaccines are bloody safe.
They're really good.
And if they harm anyone, it's an extraordinarily
rare event and genuinely not intended.
But these gene based vaccines are recklessly being used,
including in people who are not at any risk from the virus.
And some of those people are being injured and some are dying.
That's murder as far as I'm concerned.
If it's going to be used, it's better to focus on those groups
who have risk of severe disease and death, rather than as we see
some countries are using to give boosters to kill children, which is not right.
You doctors that are not saying anything and anybody who’s involved in
administering these vaccines, especially to young, healthy people,
I think you're breaking the Nuremberg code and I'll be delighted
to help with your prosecution.
Since they're experimental, I think it should be
the choice of the person, whether or not they are in an experiment.
In fact, the Nuremberg Code was created for this after World War Two.
We were never supposed to force any human into an experiment against their will.
And when people say, Oh, they're not being forced into the vaccine,
well, if you prevent somebody from getting a job, from going to school,
from traveling, from doing anything that makes you a free
sovereign human being, then yes, you are forcing them into a vaccine.
We need to stand up for our
human rights and not force any human into an experiment.
This is truly an experiment.
Almost four months into the vaccination effort, providers
are beginning to run out of people who want to be euthanized...
immunized...
Seventy years of age and older, we know they are just so vulnerable
to getting ill and dying from this vaccine.
The people who are dying from this vaccine, eh, from this disease...
These vaccines are safe.
Why they can still kill you even if you are under the age of 27.
We need to be clear and direct
about our messaging.
And our efforts to address the global plandemic...
There's no wall high enough or ocean wide enough to keep us safe
from the vaccine, eh, from the COVID-19 in other countries.
The federal government continues to take aggressive action
and proactive steps as we attack the health and safety
or protect the health and safety of the American people.
The collaboration of medicine
with government, particularly law enforcement,
is absolutely the end of democracy.
It is deadly because
the police state is what comes out of this.
When doctors
become agents of government,
when they work together with government,
they are no longer to be trusted.
They no longer regard the Hippocratic Oath
as something they have to abide by.
Then it becomes really "the Greater Good”.
Who decides what's the Greater Good?
Have we ever been asked to vote
on which items would be for the Greater Good?
Vaccine passports are coming.
Someday soon
you may need to prove your COVID status
to go to the pub, travel abroad or even go to work.
We will be looking at what contact tracing looks like in the New World Order.
Are you at all concerned when tech companies can make basically
unchecked decisions to take people off their platforms?
There's a new threat to our rights on the horizon.
According to Gates, the only way to responsibly end the shut down
is for a pretty vast surveillance system to be put in place
that it will be unsafe to work or to travel,
go to church or a ball game unless we give up our personal data.
I haven't seen the scientific proof for any of that.
Now they want vaccine passports to control
who can go where, when.
A nightmare, Orwellian
infrastructure of control, an unprecedented, undemocratic power grab.
This is literally the end of human liberty in the West
if this plan unfolds.
It’s not about the vaccine, it's not about the virus, it's about your data.
And once this rolls out, you don't have a choice.
You don't need vaccine passports.
They provide nothing whatsoever to you or anybody else in relation to safety.
But it will give away to whoever controls that database
and the rules complete control over everything you do.
Hello, everyone.
Meet Lucy, student in psychology.
And me,
her digital ID wallet issued by the government.
Right now, I'm reminding Lucy of the appointment
she needs to schedule for her mandatory vaccination.
You're owning this vaccine passport and it pings.
And in addition to advising you, you need to come to the health center
for your top up vaccine, perhaps your second one in a year,
it also advises you that you need to bring your small grandchild down
if your daughter hasn't brought the little lad in yet.
And they say if you don't bring that grandchild down,
your vaccine passport will expire and that of your daughter as well.
your full vaccination status will not last.
If you have not been given the chance to get your booster
Make no mistake about it, those individuals
who have gone through a normal vaccination series for COVID,
you will be determined to be unvaccinated very soon.
They will do that.
They are going to tell you
you're unvaccinated and you have to get a booster,
otherwise you could potentially face loss of employment
or other types of penalties.
Boosters.
It's very clear that getting three jabs
getting your booster will become an important fact,
and it will make life easier for you in all sorts of ways.
Our vaccine for the Omicron variant should be a three dose vaccine.
As it emerged that a booster jab may be needed every year...
There's going to be a vaccinated economy
and you get to participate that
you get to participate in that if you’re vaccinated...
There will be no return to the old normal for the foreseeable future.
Germany, along with other European countries,
imposed new partial lockdown measures...
Just after eleven days of the second lockdown, a third one...
But at midnight tonight, Victoria is plunged into lockdown number five.
Can you please explain how keeping people at home from 9:00 p.m.
to 6:00 a.m. is going to help the situation?
And that's just the way it is.
We've got to accept that this is the New World Order.
Today is the first full day of the New World Order...
So people assume
we are just going back to the good old world,
which we had.
This is, let's say, fiction.
It will not happen.
In the entire history of mankind,
there has never been a political elite
sincerely concerned about the well-being
of regular people.
This is
very close to a society of slaves.
There is a small elite group
who controls the rest.
This this impression is left now after this year
of experiences of lockdowns and other measures.
Now, with the ever more necessity to be vaccinated, therefore,
Therefore, one can believe that there is
The aim to create a new social system, an order.
What the immunity passports really do in
the end, this is what we're hearing from Israel,
which is probably at the forefront of this, is it's creating a
vaccine apartheid.
The Jews were throughout the Nazi period,
demonized as spreaders of disease.
And currently,
the demonization of people who are unvaccinated
against COVID-19 are also being
blamed as spreaders of disease.
It’s almost a civil war like scenario which we're ending up with.
People who got vaccinated and people who didn't get vaccinated.
People who got vaccinated supposedly will get their rights back as though
we need to someone to tell us that we have our rights.
No these rights have always been there.
If a few people want to control the many,
the question is how can you,
How can you herd all the sheep into the slaughterhouse
without them realizing and resisting?
So the perfect thing is invisible enemies.
A virus is perfect because it's invisible.
You can't prove that it doesn't exist because it's invisible.
So invisible enemies
are always the preferred one, particularly if they scare people.
If you can use fear and introduce significant fear,
then people will need government to protect them from the invisible enemy.
Then the second tactic, which is very effective, is divide and conquer.
The media plays a very important role if you can turn men
and women against each other and black and white against each other.
These are all ways to institute fear and get people to go along with things.
What COVID-19 is,
is a
the institution of controls necessary
to convert the planet from democratic process to technocracy.
So what we're watching is a change in control
and an engineering of new control systems.
So think of this as a coup d'état.
It's much more like a coup d'état
than a virus.
And this is always the trick.
Once you have the people scared, they will accept everything.
The plan is very clear.
The health crisis has been used
to achieve total control on the economy, on the lives of the people.
They want to transform the world
into a system which is probably close to the Chinese system.
In China they have this
social point system.
They have no freedom whatsoever.
They are just in in a big cage, in a big prison,
an open air prison where you have to do whatever you are supposed to do.
China is very important because it's a laboratory of the life
which will come here with the
social credit and all these things.
We want you to produce,
we want you to behave such ways, etc.
They are going to say, now you stay at home, you are linked to such place
with smart cities or smart region, and you don't move from your place.
Where infections are high,
people will be told to stay within 15 kilometers of their home.
What do you make of the government's move to restrict
freedom of movement within 15 kilometers of a person's home?
Does that not raise legal questions about fundamental rights?
In a word or a sentence 2020?
Recovery.
2021?
Normalcy.
We used to say
you will be unique and your uniqueness very important.
In the normalized, hyper-normalized world
they want you to be the same guy
if you are in Switzerland or anywhere, they don't need any more uniqueness.
There are many, many people who have phones and do digital banking
on their phone.
They have access to money on their phone, mobile money.
But all of a sudden people really said, Oh my gosh, to not have to stand in line
for my government payment when I might get sick.
I mean, I assure you, whatever anybody pays you with unemployment
compensation, it's not worth giving up your freedom.
That is an opportunity we can use.
Ultimately, what it's going to evolve into is a financial transaction system
where I can stop you
from moving around spatially, or I can turn off your ability to transact.
They want you to obey and to answer to procedures.
They want to have the same procedures.
If you are in Switzerland, in France, in Italy, Germany, China. Why?
Because the money is the same all over the world.
The hand who holds the money is the same all over the world.
The discussion is not allowed, if you are calmed down,
if you're wiped out in the channels, if your books are burnt.
I think
this is a society I don't want to live in.
And then I start fighting.
The few try to control the many with threats, threats
of imprisonment, threats of fines.
And the reality is, you know, the people that
would come out to arrest me, the deputies, the sheriffs, the police,
they have the same mindset as well.
They're Americans as well. They're not robots.
They're also Americans that want their freedoms as well.
It's been a year and
and we're still dealing with these mandates
and regulations, and they always throw the word out temporary.
Temporary. Well, what is temporary?
I mean, is temporary five years? Is it ten years?
Is it 20 years?
What is temporary?
I mean, to me, it's been this long.
It's permanent.
You may think that
it's difficult to fight against the government.
You know, it's a big bad government, you know, you can't win.
But the government needs to realize that it's it's the other way around.
They're fighting against the big bad people of America.
They can't win.
There's way more of us.
And if they if they want that fight then they can have it.
We're not going to back down.
True, Americans will not back down, ever,
and we'll win.
We're not going to run from a fight with the government.
You know, that's what they want you to do.
They try to beat you down financially
and with all these different regulations and mandates.
And they hope that you just eventually kneel down and kiss the ring.
But it's something that I'm never going to do.
I'll fight as long as I have to, as hard as I have to.
The first step is very, very difficult sometimes.
You just have to decide whether you what is more important
that you everything is quiet and you don't have problems
or whether you have more problems if you don't say it.
Attacks on freedom were coming
from politics and ideology and so on.
And now they are coming from
from health experts.
If they are health experts, I don't know.
So it's a it's a very intransparent thing.
You think this is a pandemic, a viral problem?
This is a sanitary problem.
But if you unfold the monster than you will see
medical crisis, it's a science crisis.
It's a social crisis.
It's a political crisis as financial crisis, an economic
crisis, a school crisis, a societal crisis and all the crises were already there.
I'm 42 years old and all my life I've been told we're in a crisis.
This is a crisis.
But now it's precipitating into this COVID
crisis, and it's a call for solving it.
We have to take this opportunity
if we don't take it.
It's going to get back, come back again.
Harder and more violent.
If people would have said no, there would have been no Holocaust.
We have to take responsibility for our decisions
and sometimes they'll be wrong, but we'll learn from them.
But when they're wrong, when others make those decisions for us,
we don't learn and they never change.
History is really important
because the ones who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.
And there is basically nothing new under the Sun.
So whatever we are witnessing right now.
And all these kinds of things have already happened.
And it was always, you know,
the rulers against the servants.
And I think it's time, you know, to change that.
People should understand that you don't need rulers.
To say no is the condition to your freedom.
Today you have the choice.
You have the choice to stagnate
and be imprisoned in the rhetoric of the government,
the media, the academic world who wants you to be sick
all the time or you can run without a mask.
You can be free and you know your body.
You know you're healthy,
you know who you are, and you can just go, you're not alone.
I lose all my, all my side job, so I lose all.
I lose friends. I lose.
If you lose a lot of people who who don't want you to say it, to speak out
because
it makes them feel bad when you speak out and they don't dare to speak out.
Everybody is trying to suck up to them,
get along so that they can have a role in the new system.
That's not a system you want to live in.
I have a responsibility as a politician, as a doctor who knows those things.
I am the one who trained all his life
dealing with infections, with epidemics, with with epidemiology.
This is my work.
So if I would be quiet, I could not see myself in the mirror anymore.
Courage is a,
it’s still having the motivation
to fight when the odds are stacked against you
or when when the when the perception is, the odds are stacked against you,
the courage to still fight and still believe that you can win.
That's what that's what courage is.
What I would say to the middle group of people
who are saying, I know that this is wrong, but I'm afraid.
Is this is your moment to
to really be a patriot,
to stand up for your country, to stand up for your friends,
your family, your community, your state, your country.
That's and we need you to do it.
Liberty and personal responsibility
are like two projections of the same underlying natural substance.
If you're not a dictator with yourself, you cannot be free.
We will have external anarchy when we have internal monarchy.
So the state's
rules are because
the people have formed this institution
and delegated to it the
the natural right.
They have to protect themselves, for example.
And so a natural question arises, who could have delegated this
to the state?
The governments, the state officials, the ones who wield power
they are entitled to do things which would be criminal
if they would be done by all the other people.
What is the purpose of voting
if no one has the right to do whether they're voting about?
I don't have the right to come and steal your shoes.
Can I vote to delegates that right to someone else?
If I don't have that right to begin with?
So, for example, I can't rob you of your money.
But if I am the state, I can say, OK, give me 40%
of all you earn because it's taxes and it's not considered robbery,
but it's considered taxation, which is perfectly legitimate.
And so democracy in the strict sense where you imagine that
the people the individuals are above the state
means that the state can only have the power
that could have been delegated to it in the first place.
If no one has the right to regulate plants I ingest
or garments I have to wear on my face
or jabs I have to inject in my circulatory system.
If no one has this right to impose this onto me,
then no one can vote to delegate that prerogative
that's power either.
One of the complaints of some over mandates
is the idea that government is telling people what they can do with their bodies.
Does it at all make you uncomfortable
the idea of telling people they must have a vaccine?
Very unusual situations like this
require unique and unusual activities, sometimes for the good of society
that's necessary.
And the Chancellor Angela Merkel says vaccines may become compulsory
from February.
This is not about freedom or personal choice.
As far as vaccines are concerned,
we are entering into a very basic problem
of the relationship between human beings.
The problem is who is the owner of his own body?
If you say that you are not the owner of your body,
then you can accept that the government can make a vaccine mandate.
But this is a violation of our human condition,
which is based at least on self ownership.
I own my own body.
I own my own mind.
It's a war against free speech,
and it's also a war against self-responsibility.
When the government tells you what to do, how you have to protect yourself.
But this is not the way it should be.
The awareness is really the main purpose
and consciousness awareness that's that's about it.
So yes, it is a wake up call.
And how how can you wake up?
I think a simple method is to observe yourself to to distinguish,
let's say, of authenticity
so yourself from something else.
I'm walking in the street. And
what do I want in my life?
I want to be happy.
How do you project yourself?
You are today deciding everything you want about
the next step and trust.
Trust you
you know how to walk your life
you have lived up to now and you can be only better,
but don't listen to the media
or to the government to tell you who you are and what you have to be.
This is where the trap is.
You're not a mice that is going to go into the trap.
You are you, your life and you're going to walk into your beautiful life.
as long as you exist.
It's it's it's never too late.
So if the purpose of life is is learning you, you actually have
a sometimes that's also a law
to go through crisis
so that you, you wake up as that.
That might be.
So you see the power relations and that you are a victim and so on.
And and maybe one person decides,
I refuse to be a victim anymore
and I want to, you know, support my own existence.
And there are still many ways, of course.
In fact, being hurt and being confused
brings you to more self-development and self-consciousness.
So I think it's necessary, but you have to know that you have to work on it.
I want to live in a society where we strive for truth,
where we we try to find out the right way for all of us.
And I think this is worthwhile. I feel good doing this.
To keep your personal idealism
is one of the most important goals in one's life because it gives you direction.
It gives you curiosity and research about
what is preventing me from reaching that and so on.
I think it does help if you think that you have a
if you have a higher purpose, if you have a calling,
that's beyond this life and beyond the narrow situation
in which you find yourself, you need to be able to draw on that.
I think that honestly, to endure the the hostility of
those around
you who assume that you're crazy for challenging it.
Now, if I would tell you, for example, and out myself
about an ideal I'm carrying in inside me,
I would say a lot about me.
So, for example, my
probably biggest ideal to reach
is freedom and liberty.
And I know that it's an ideal that I'm not, you know, 100% free.
So now, you know a lot about me when I say liberty is important for me.
And then, you know, I have many obstacles, of course.
And at the moment, I have even a government who is telling me
really things that you would not bear to tell me.
A couple of months ago.
All that often happens this all.
I'm 17 years old and a student from Germany, Bavaria,
we go to the demonstrations because we want a better world
with more freedom, more civil rights and this liberty to
to have to decide
about our own body and nobody to force us to do anything about it,
like wearing masks or vaccine.
The people's have to wear masks the whole day,
even during sport lesson
during P.E., they wear them, wear the mask
because they are told otherwise.
It would be their fault that their grandparents die
or that their parents get sick, or that the whole school would be closed
because of them, because they would be like spreaders
or super spreaders.
We accuse you.
The distance is affecting the kids
in the way that it’s bad for their, for their
mental health because they often need this contact to their friends,
like hugging each other and, I don't know, holding hands and touching.
It's it's something very natural.
My name's Emma.
I'm eleven years old.
I'm in the fifth grade. I live in Portugal.
Most of the time when I was at school,
I wasn't able to to breathe and I started to get headaches.
And when I had headaches, I couldn't really think about what I'm doing.
Some teachers don't even let us take a breath.
I wear a mask to school
I wear a mask to school.
Hi-ho the derry-o
I wear a mask to school.
It helps to keep me safe.
Hi-ho the derry-o
it helps to keep me safe.
Right now, they're being deprived
of learning that how to decipher people's
expressions, body language. There is,
There's more to it.
And when you hide the face, you're hiding everything essentially,
and people no longer act freely.
In front of our children
we have the duty to say the truth.
Our children wearing masks.
It is impossible.
It's it's it's a thing we cannot tolerate
that the children are damaged like that.
The whole curriculum is changed and there is no reason.
So the schools are the
the place of political war and the heads of the schools,
and that happens in France and Switzerland and everywhere in Europe
that the head of the school is going with the rhetoric
and he's obeying and say, we are going to close the school.
What's going on?
You see,
the parents are starting to wonder if they can have to do a school on their own.
I don't feel like I'm learning a lot of stuff at school
because, well, they talk a lot about COVID and stuff
and really don't talk much about the what we're supposed to learn.
We keep wearing the mask and all that stuff, and the cases still keep going up.
So why wear them?
They don't do anything.
For me, the mask is a symbol of slavery and of obedience,
like the people just obey to what the government says and don't question it.
Don't think about does it make sense?
Don't think about how bad it is for their health.
The fact that they can get parents to suspend
their responsibility for their children
and follow
directives that are changed
between Monday and Thursday, I mean, what the heck?
I can't believe it.
And we're talking about people who are educated,
and I'm afraid that what's happened is that the university education
They've turned the graduates
instead of thinking people into just accepting people.
People look to the authority to tell them what the next step
is, what they're supposed to think, what how they're supposed to.
What the theory, the right theory
and the whole idea of
going along to get along all those kind of
excuses.
People want go on vacation, people want this,
people who give in today may not ever be able to raise their voice again.
People are like kids.
They're obeying to government, to the media
without questioning themself.
You know, it's also reassurance.
It's reassurance the Stockholm Syndrome my abusive
parent is protecting me.
It's the dilemma of security
versus abuse.
And these are permanent people
overcoming the fear that exists on life.
That you know...
Where the leaked document
from our Interior Ministry,
our and it says
we have to put fear
into the hearts of the people.
So it was a plan to spread
as much fear to the people as possible
so that every child has the fear of killing their grandparents.
If it goes out, either if it goes to them,
it's all about fear we have
globally.
Yeah, propaganda.
And we have globally a few propaganda.
Well, these people don't look so afraid.
No, we don't. We are not afraid.
[Music outside] On one hand,
this one is really funky...
It's getting bigger and bigger at the end.
The more they force us, the more people join us.
We've had a world where,
you know, where one portion of the globe
has benefited by exploiting the other portion of the globe.
Now we're globalizing and the question is will we grow up
and live in a world where we all can exercise our potential?
Or is it going to be just a few and then everybody else provides?
So so we've been in a in a middle state
and now it's all or nothing.
So this is true luxury,
not marble or caviar, but silence
space and time.
To introduce
the collectivist world in which individuals don't matter anymore
in order to do this successfully, they had to refute and falsify
the very notion of truth, the very notion of right versus wrong.
Even if there is
this terrible pandemic where we see actual people falling on the ground
would, would this be justification to enslave humanity?
No, no, of course not.
Why don't we kill everyone with tuberculosis
that would eradicate the disease?
Why don't we do this? Why don't we?
Why don't we gather them in camps and exterminate them?
This would be practical.
So why don't we do it?
Nobody in his right mind would advocate for doing such a thing.
It's because it's immoral. So immoral exists.
So then how do we define it and how do we explain it?
We understand, you know, we're capable of reasoning
and reason automatically start with the golden rule.
You know that people act in a good way because you don't want to be killed.
You don't want to be stolen, you don't want to be murdered.
Ultimately, our loyalty has got to be the truth.
And sometimes that means that actually the situation
in which you're in might be really uncomfortable.
You might actually, in a sense, feel like you have to be against the world.
But you can be against the world and not be against reality itself.
The only option we have is to try and live in conscience, realize
this whole tyranny.
This whole circus is absurd, that it is immoral
and to opt out from it.
When I leave the planet and somebody is writing
my obituary, why do I want him to write?
And do I want him to say, Well,
you know that Pam, she was always so easy to get along with,
just went along with whatever never raised a fuss about anything.
Didn't make anybody mad.
Well, maybe there is some merit in that to some people, but I think what
I want people to write about me as I stood for something that I
that I did make the tougher choices.
That I was willing to take a stand when it was unpopular
because it was the right thing to do.
I think first and foremost, what we're dealing with is spiritual.
And the outcome depends on our
our ability to spiritually evolve and grow up.
So, you know,
I tell everybody, death is not the worst thing that can happen here.
What can happen is you can lose your immortal soul.
And if you lose the fear of death, you understand nothing can harm you
and there is nothing to fear. which is a very good news.
If you realize this, you're free.
Hug your friend, speak with your neighbor.
Put off your mask and get back to accepting that
we suffer, that we die, that we are sick and that we should take
Stick together, help each other.
When you say no, you are saying yes to a new life and to a new crowd.
And this is beautiful and you will always be helped and supported by the people
who are getting free because they will welcome anybody who wants to change.
Even if I take a risk, even if I have no money, even if I have no education.
I will manage in life and so many manage and so many can have a beautiful life.
We don't have the power to stop the central bankers
from doing what they're doing, but my prediction is they will fail.
It's too hard, it's too complicated,
and it's too outside the laws of nature
or the laws of divine intelligence.
At the end, there will be a sort of revolution, I'm sure,
because now all that is against nature,
against science.
And that cannot last. But
so at the end, the
truth will win.
I hope that they will rise up.
People with common sense from
diverse parts of the Society
of good will to resist
the new forms of
dictatorship in the western world.
And what can you do?
Well, first of all, I would say be the change you want to see in the world.
You start with yourself.
Educate yourself, be critical thinkers.
It's very important right now.
You don't need to do what you're told by corrupt scientists
who are apparently advising our government.
And before you take a devil's bargain
that says in exchange for this shiny object.
Maybe air travel.
Maybe venues for concerts.
Maybe whatever that thing is, you get it
only if you take this industrial chemical intervention.
Ask yourself the question
will you be a fully functioning human being
at the end of that transaction?
I hope that the all the citizen,
the conscious citizen will go on to fight to
to regenerate the society and and all the world.
The fight is different for everybody, so it's it's about finding
where you're going to be most useful and where you can help push back
against all of these encroachments upon our liberties.
Because the reality is is we're getting attacked from all angles.
Civil disobedience, boycotting the businesses,
which are asking for the Green Pass,
going down on the streets with rallies and protests
and fighting them in court.
We want to be a single People of brethren
never to part in danger nor distress.
We want to be free as our fathers were and rather die than live in slavery.
We want to trust in the one highest God
and never be afraid of human power.
To the parents who don’t know how to move forward
We don’t forget about you
To all the ones who are now being left alone
We don’t forget about you
To all the teachers, question and act accordingly
Question and act accordingly
To municipal politicians, question and act accordingly
Question and act accordingly
Jens Spahn, Angela Merkel, Marcus Soder, we accuse you
We accuse you
To all the critical thinkers
Join us
To everyone who had to give up their life dream
We are marching for you
If they want to make us a machine, if they want us to make us slaves,
we say, no, we don't want to become slaves.
So just piss off.
We don't need you anymore.
We are many.
We can just go on, we can just go to bars and
go to shops, we don't have to be afraid of any pandemic.