People say that negotiations are better than war. Yes, negotiations are better than war, but tell me, did these negotiations you engaged in stop the war?

​These negotiations are taking place under fire, giving legitimacy to the war, siding with Israel against Lebanese citizens, and telling the Israelis, "You have the right to ask for whatever you want to ask for," while the authorities continue with the negotiations.

​So, this is not negotiation in exchange for war; this is negotiation called surrender with humiliation, without any substitute and without anything.

«They lifted the blockade, they lifted the sanctions. Then the Lebanon war was supposed to be stopped, and they stopped it. They were unfreezing our money—meaning, in discussions, because unfreezing was proceeding like that through ongoing talks so this could happen.»

«The investments that were supposed to take place, up to $300 billion, they had plans for them. Our experts were drafting and writing them up. And we were supposed to, during that period, open the path in the Strait of Hormuz so that things would return to how they were at the beginning.»

«Because within that clause regarding the Strait of Hormuz, it was required to observe the frameworks established by the Islamic Republic. Because they failed to observe them, this agreement broke down again.»

«But now, once again in the dialogue process we are in, that roadmap for the path that needs to pass through the Strait of Hormuz—which our experts, our brothers in the IRGC, the security and military forces, and the group currently engaged in talks are working on—I have conveyed that path to the Leader, showing that an agreement has been reached.»

«I would say the Omanis at first accompanied us a bit, then expressed some objections, but ultimately yesterday—or the day before yesterday, when the Omanis came—they reached that understanding again. They accepted that we and Oman, within that framework and based on the plan that was coordinated, would open the path. That we can reopen it.»

«And now, in fact, we are pursuing this so that, according to those frameworks, if this path opens and America fulfills its commitments—which means lifting the blockade, lifting sanctions, both regarding oil and petrochemical matters, unfreezing our funds, restarting investments, and halting the actions they are taking in Lebanon, compelling Israel to adhere to those frameworks—then we will also naturally open the Strait of Hormuz route based on the decisions that form the system's policy.»

«It is a framework where, in fact, we said the Strait must be opened in this manner. Our talks with the opposing sides are based on that very memorandum of understanding we had. And to the extent that progress has been made, they accept that they must return to the memorandum of understanding and execute the frameworks we have set.»

What is being discussed inside the ruins regarding food rot, scabies among the American military, and fatal psychological cases? All of these are losses that will hopefully appear gradually.

​As for the Israeli entity, look at the migration happening outward, the existing economic situation, and the rot inside the Israeli entity. Do not think that they are succeeding; no, they have losses, and the losses will be greater.

America is not neutral; America is complicit with Israel, and the whole world knows that America is never a mediator between you and the Israelis—never.

​America and Israel are one. Haven't you heard Netanyahu and Gallant and those folks always saying, "We bombed with American permission, in consultation with America, talking with CENTCOM"?

​So, there is complete coordination, and even if you listen to the American ambassador and all American officials, how do they speak? They speak in a way that clearly shows they are with them and not separate. America is not neutral.